Gypsum Plaster disadvantages You Should Know Before Using It
Gypsum plaster is widely used in modern interior construction because of its smooth finish, fast application, and reduced curing time. But while it offers many advantages, gypsum plaster also has several drawbacks that builders should consider before selecting it for large-scale or long-term projects.
Understanding these disadvantages helps construction professionals avoid costly mistakes and choose materials that match performance, budget, and durability expectations. This guide breaks down the key weaknesses of gypsum plaster in clear, practical terms.
1. Moisture Sensitivity: The Most Critical Drawback
One of the biggest issues with gypsum plaster is its poor resistance to moisture. Gypsum absorbs water rapidly, which weakens the material and leads to surface defects such as bubbling, discoloration, mold formation, or complete degradation. In high-humidity environments—such as basements, coastal regions, bathrooms, and kitchens—gypsum plaster often fails to maintain its integrity.
Moisture exposure not only reduces its strength but also increases maintenance costs over time. Even with protective coatings, gypsum cannot match the long-term moisture resistance of cement-based materials. For this reason, gypsum plaster is recommended only for dry interior spaces with controlled humidity levels.
2. Not Suitable for Exterior Applications
Is Gypsum Plaster Suitable for Exterior Applications?
Another major gypsum plaster disadvantage is that gypsum plaster cannot be used outdoors under any circumstances. It deteriorates quickly when exposed to sunlight, rain, or fluctuating temperatures. UV radiation, humidity changes, and weather stress cause gypsum to soften, peel, crack, or completely detach from the surface.
This limits its usage exclusively to interior walls and ceilings. For façades, parking areas, balconies, or any external structure, cement plaster remains the preferred and more durable choice. Builders seeking longevity in exposed environments should never rely on gypsum-based plasters.
3. Lower Strength and Durability Compared to Cement
Gypsum plaster is softer than cement plaster, which directly affects its mechanical performance. It provides lower compressive and flexural strength, making it more vulnerable to dents, scratches, and impact damage. In high-traffic interiors such as hospitals, schools, commercial shops, or industrial spaces, gypsum surfaces may deteriorate faster.
This softness also makes it less suitable for walls requiring structural rigidity or resistance to rough use. Additional repairs, patching, or reapplication may be needed over time, resulting in higher long-term maintenance costs compared to cement plaster.
4. Higher Material Cost in Many Regions
Although gypsum plaster reduces labor time, the material itself is often more expensive than traditional cement–sand plaster—especially in regions where natural gypsum supply is limited or imported. For large-scale residential or commercial projects, the cost difference becomes significant.
Builders must evaluate whether gypsum’s speed and finish justify the higher cost per square meter. In many cases, cement plaster remains more budget-friendly, especially when the client prioritizes cost efficiency over application convenience.
For solving this issue read the article “Buy Natural Gypsum from Iran: Save More, Get Higher Purity“
5. Limited Compatibility With Certain Wall Finishes
Despite offering a smooth surface, gypsum plaster is not always compatible with all finishing materials. Heavy claddings, certain tile types, or finishes requiring strong mechanical bonding may not adhere well to gypsum without additional primers, bonding agents, or reinforcement layers.
This extra preparation adds time and cost, reducing the advantages of gypsum plaster. Projects requiring diverse interior materials might face bonding issues that cement plaster can handle more effectively.
6. Fast Setting Time Can Lead to Application Challenges
Gypsum plaster sets quickly—sometimes within minutes. While this makes the construction process faster, it can also cause difficulties. Workers must apply and finish the plaster in a short time window, leaving very little margin for error.
Inexperienced applicators may struggle to achieve a consistent, smooth surface. Fast setting also leads to material wastage if portions harden before application. On large projects, this can increase overall cost and reduce efficiency, turning gypsum’s biggest advantage into a practical disadvantage.
Conclusion
Gypsum plaster remains a popular choice for modern interiors, but it is not suitable for every project. Its moisture sensitivity, limited exterior use, lower strength, higher cost, bonding challenges, and fast-setting application requirements make it a less-than-ideal solution in some scenarios.
Builders who understand these limitations can choose materials more effectively and avoid long-term issues. While gypsum plaster is excellent for dry, controlled interior spaces, it should be avoided in environments demanding moisture resistance, structural toughness, or versatile finish compatibility.
